Category: Climate

Despite human-induced climate change (global warming), a seemingly paradoxical phenomenon has been observed: harsher winters in some regions. Central to understanding this phenomenon is the polar vortex, a vast whirlpool of cold air encircling the poles, strongest in winter. However, under the influence of global warming, this vortex can weaken and even collapse. This disruption, often driven by sudden stratospheric warming events and changes in atmospheric pressure systems, allows frigid Arctic air to spill southward, bringing unexpected and severe cold spells to mid-latitudes. Thus, while the planet warms overall, the effects of a destabilized polar vortex illustrate how climate change can lead to complex and counterintuitive weather patterns, including colder winters in some areas.

As we inch closer to the precipice of irreversible climate change, the debate surrounding how best to address its challenges intensifies. Two primary solutions have emerged in this arena: Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and adaptation. While both have their merits, there’s a moral question at the core of this debate. Do we remove the CO₂ we’ve introduced, thereby addressing the root cause, or do we adapt to the changing world, leaving behind those who can’t? The ethics of this dilemma are further intensified when we consider those most affected by these changes, yet have benefitted the least from the industries responsible for CO₂ emissions.

NASA Climate Change channel published a worrying animation titled “Climate Spiral” that visualizes global warming since 1880 in just 70 seconds.